Court rules set precedent for ChatGPT users! Their jobs are at risk
A decision in a landmark case concerning the professional use of AI-powered tools in the US has resonated significantly in the legal world. Three attorneys from the Butler Snow law firm, which represents the state of Alabama in cases involving its prison system, were barred from the case by a federal court for allegedly adding unverified information obtained through ChatGPT to the case file.
Lawyers Admit Using Artificial IntelligenceThe court found that the inclusion of false quotations and inaccurate information in documents prepared by lawyers William Lunsford, Matthew Reeves and William Cranford constituted serious professional negligence.
According to publicly available information, lawyers admitted to using ChatGPT to find precedents and case law. However, it was revealed that they failed to verify this information before adding it to the case file.
DOCUMENTS ARE NOT BASED ON ACTUAL CASE RECORDSThe court found that none of the information in the submitted documents was based on actual case records. Consequently, the three lawyers were not only disbarred from the case but also required to notify all parties affected by the omission.
The decision mandates that this sanction be communicated to clients, opposing counsel, and judges in ongoing cases. A copy of the decision was also sent to the Alabama State Bar Association to initiate potential disciplinary proceedings.
SÖZCÜ
